Wild Country TXR tires???

ashooter

Adventurer
Does anybody have first-hand experience with the Wild Country TXR? Free shipping from tirefactory.net, made by Goodyear, look like a pretty good "all-terrain" tread design... AND they come in LT255/85R16!

Kind of an off-brand though, so I won't be the first kid on the block to try 'em!

All I could find searching the net was that they are sold by Les Schwab and some people say they're great while some say they had uneven tread wear patterns that went away when they switched back to BFG/Cooper/Toyo/whatever.
 
Last edited:

shawkins

Adventurer
I've ran them for over 10 years on my '91 4Runner. They are a great tire! More aggressive than the BFG All-Terrains but not a full out mud terrain. I love them in the snow.

I had them in the 255/85R16 size on my '98 4Runner.

They can have some funky tread wear sometimes, but if you keep them balanced you should be ok. I get around 50K to 60K miles out of 32x11.50R15's.
 
Last edited:

1leg

Explorer
What price did they quote you? Are they that allot cheaper then BFGs?
I paid local 177 for BGF 255/85s.

I would love to find an AT thats a little cheaper for DD and long road trips on Pavement.
 

prepmech

Observer
I must have had a bad set. I had a set of 315/75R16s on my F250. I only got 30K miles on them. The lug voids filled with mud quickly and didn't clean out very well, even with lots of wheel speed. I have never hydroplaned so much as when I was running them. My truck weighed over 8K lbs, so they may do better on lighter rigs.

Noticed in your sig that you are running Revos now, I am running them on my jeep that replaced the F250 and they have been much better than the TXRs in same situations.
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Yep, funney you should ask...

Edit: Even funnier because I can't type "funny" :)

Below is some of the text from an article I wrote for the Power Stroke Registry magazine about 8-years ago after replacing my first set of TXRs in 255/85R16.

Multi-Mile Wild-Country TXR 255/85R16

After replacing the stock tires on Pull Dog, we figured we would settle into a routine of new tires every Autumn. We drive more than average and that would insure that we were entering the winter season with fresh treads under our chassis. After two years had passed we had logged over 36,000-miles on our 255s, and our third winter was near. Our plan to buy new tires was scrapped, as our tires had much tread left.

All of us want our tires to last a long time. Tires are expensive, but getting new tires is a fun and exciting proposition. We were beginning to think we were not going to ever need a new set of TXRs!

The Second Set

The fourth winter after our initial TXR purchase was fast approaching, and our tire tread was still fairly deep. One afternoon while walking up to Pull Dog in a parking lot and scrutinizing our tires, I noticed a 3-inch long cut on the inside of the sidewall on our left-front tire! We doubt it was vandalism as who would take the time to cut the inside of a sidewall? We assume we hit an object in the roadway that we did not notice. Or maybe our low-pressure off-roading abused the casing, causing the eventual separation. Regardless, we went straight to our Les Schwab dealer and bought our second set of LT255/85R16 D-range tires. The tread remaining on our damaged left-front tire was pro-rated, and we received a credit for $50.39.

The End Is Not Near!

When we discovered our damaged sidewall and replaced our TXRs we had traveled 46,818-miles on our original set of 255s, all of which had 7/32 of tread depth remaining. We had used 11/32 of the original 18/32 of tread depth. We had averaged 1/32” of tread wear every 4,256 miles. At this rate of wear we could have driven 68,096-miles before reaching the minimum legal tread depth of 2/32! That is very impressive! As the saying goes, “your mileage may vary”.


I believe the Current TXRs are called TXR II, a slightly modified tread design. I really like the tread void ratio, and consider it quite similar to the Cooper ST.

Negatives:

The TXRs caused a side to side wiggle in the steering wheel that I didn't find too objectionable on the F350 but I didn't care for when I bought a third set for TXRs in 2005 for a Jeep LJ Rubicon. I had this third set siped 13/32” when new which in hindsight I think was too deep and caused tread squirm.

The sidewalls are softer (nice ride but...) maybe close to the Cooper ST/maybe not the most rugged design?

The second set on the F350-follow-up:

I was antelope hunting in the Nevada desert a few years ago with low PSI, about 20-25 in the front with a heavy diesel, driving it pretty fast/hard on dirt roads with some small rocks when I received a slow leak puncture at the edge of the tread in the sidewall from a very small but sharp stick/ piece of brush. After this I decided I needed a tougher tire for the F350. I later bought a set of Toyo M55s as you have read elsewhere. Less void, about the same noise/volume but a different tone. You know the rest of the story.

The second set on the F350 were also not going to last nearly as long, but I'm quite confident that was because I was not driving the truck as smoothly and slow as before.

I looked into buying another set (TXR II) a few months ago, but found availability an issue for me locally and decided against them. There are too many other good choices with local retailers.

Redline, The Imelda Marco Of Tires :)
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I thought the traction was pretty good for what the tire is (not a full-on mud tire) but I was coming from much less aggressive tires back then and the TXR was a huge improvement over typical ATs. Now I would say it is close to the Cooper ST in void ratio/traction. A cross-over tread if you will.

Is it possible the hydroplaning was partially from the width of the 351s?

prepmech said:
I must have had a bad set. I had a set of 315/75R16s on my F250. I only got 30K miles on them. The lug voids filled with mud quickly and didn't clean out very well, even with lots of wheel speed. I have never hydroplaned so much as when I was running them. My truck weighed over 8K lbs, so they may do better on lighter rigs.

Noticed in your sig that you are running Revos now, I am running them on my jeep that replaced the F250 and they have been much better than the TXRs in same situations.
 

Jeep

Supporting Sponsor: Overland Explorer Expedition V
I had good all around success with a set of 35x12.50-16.5's on the old Chevy 3/4 ton with a camper. Very good tread wear.
 

prepmech

Observer
Redline said:
Is it possible the hydroplaning was partially from the width of the 315s?

It could have been, it could have been because of lack of tread also. For some reason they wore down pretty quickly for me, even with frequent rotations. I drove offroad with them every day on the construction sites where I work, and a lot of that was on shot rock which is very sharp. After that set of tires I put a set of BFG ATKOs on the truck and didn't have any of the hydroplaning or wear issues, it got rid of a vibration too. I actually ended up getting over 80K miles on the BFGs.

I think I might have just had a bad set. A guy I work with had them on a 1/2 ton chevy, and didn't have any problems with them. I think he said he put 50K miles on them.
 

shawkins

Adventurer
FWIW, When I went to go get new tires at Les Schwab a couple months ago they said they are no longer making the TXR's, but there is a "new version" out which is called the SXT.

I have the SXT's in 32x11.50R15 on my '91 4Runner now.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Actually the rest of the story is that the TXR II is still made by TBC tire corp but Les Schwab is no longer handling the tire, and they are pushing the Dean (Cooper) SXT mud terrain instead. It's marketing not availability.

The Dean SXT is a good tire and very similar to the Cooper ST also discussed here.


shawkins said:
FWIW, When I went to go get new tires at Les Schwab a couple months ago they said they are no longer making the TXR's, but there is a "new version" out which is called the SXT.

I have the SXT's in 32x11.50R15 on my '91 4Runner now.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Maybe you did have a bad set, but I think a lot of it was the conditions you mentioned. Even though some people get really good wear out of the TXRs, they had/have a fairly soft compound (nice in snow/ice) and I bet the rock ate them up fast (like it does lots of tires). Of course this doesn't explain why your coworker’s set lasted 50k on his 1/2-ton, but there are so many variables.


prepmech said:
It could have been, it could have been because of lack of tread also. For some reason they wore down pretty quickly for me, even with frequent rotations. I drove offroad with them every day on the construction sites where I work, and a lot of that was on shot rock which is very sharp. After that set of tires I put a set of BFG ATKOs on the truck and didn't have any of the hydroplaning or wear issues, it got rid of a vibration too. I actually ended up getting over 80K miles on the BFGs.

I think I might have just had a bad set. A guy I work with had them on a 1/2 ton chevy, and didn't have any problems with them. I think he said he put 50K miles on them.
 

Haggis

Appalachian Ridgerunner
Here's a couple shots of the Dean Mud Terrian SXTs. Just got a set for my Jeep. I got alot of recommendations from guys running these on their snow plow rigs and their lease field trucks that are really happy with them. My local tire guy got these in 285/75/16 mounted and balanced for $143 a piece. Built by Cooper in the Findaly, OH plant using the same carcass as the Cooper Discovery STs. I post a thread on them later.

100_2801a.jpg


100_2800a.jpg
 

Woofwagon

Adventurer
FWIW, I have a set on the Suburbillac and they're wearing like iron. I have a set of their Severe Service tires that are 10 ply load range E tires. Incredible traction in the snow and mud. They are really quiet on the freeway, no drone.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,849
Messages
2,910,992
Members
231,246
Latest member
nwpiperpilot
Top
­