What do you think about this non-street legal “Jeep” clone?

Martinjmpr

Wiffleball Batter
Questions:

How much latitude does a state have in licensing a vehicle for highway use that does not me federal emissions or safety standards?

Can such a vehicle be driven across state lines legally?

That's kind of an apples-to-oranges comparison.

The Federal government has the authority to regulate IMPORTS and to require that vehicles that are imported for HIGHWAY use meet certain standards for emissions, safety, etc.

But once they're in the US, the Federal government doesn't regulate them as that is a state matter. Some states (like CA) have very strict emissions requirements that all but prohibit certain vehicles from being sold or registered there and other states have little or no emissions requirements.

States also have broad authority to regulate motorcycles and UTVs and to decide whether or under what circumstances they can be licensed for road use. In Colorado, for example, you CANNOT license a 4 wheeled vehicle for road use if it was not originally designed for road use (IOW you cannot put a license plate on a 4 wheeled ATV or UTV no matter what.) Now, there are counties in CO where ATVs/UTVs are permitted to drive on COUNTY roads, but in this case it's not so much that they're "legal" to use on the street (they're not), but rather that they are "tolerated" (or to put it differently, the county has made it a policy not to enforce the law and to look the other way.)

In other states, you CAN get a license plate on a UTV or ATV, it's almost always a "Motorcycle" license plate and sometimes there are restrictions on where you can use it (often having to do with speed limits - such as "cannot use on any road where the speed limit is greater than 50mph.")

As far as driving THOSE vehicles across state lines - yes, it CAN be legal as long as the vehicle is operated in a legal manner in BOTH states. So, for example, if South Dakota allows a Roxor to be plated as a UTV and Wyoming does as well, then you could drive a South Dakota registered ROXOR into Wyoming and vice-versa.

But you COULD NOT drive it into Colorado, even though it has a Wyoming or South Dakota plate because 4 wheeled ATVs are not street legal in CO, no matter where they are registered.

Roxor, IMO, is trying to game the system by bringing in what is, to any observer, a 4 wheeled automobile and classifying it as a UTV so as to avoid the requirements that imported automobiles have for safety, rollover protection, air bags, emissions, lighting, etc.

At this point Mahindra is basically daring the Federal government to tighten up the rules as to what can be classified as a "UTV" for purposes of importation (I don't think there are any right now.) After all, if the Mahindra is successful, what is to prevent someone from importing, say, a 70-series LC to the US and classifying it as a "UTV?" Or maybe one of those Russian 4 wheel drive vehicles that do not otherwise meet safety and emissions standards?

You could even take it to ridiculous extremes and try to import an 8x8 KAMAZ tractor as a "UTV."

But the REAL legal danger, IMO, does not come from the Feds, it comes from lawsuit-happy attorneys, the plantiff's bar. If someone gets injured because a Roxor was illegally being used on a highway - particularly if it can be claimed that the injury is due to lack of airbags, ABS, rollover protection or other things that a road-legal vehicle would have - then the lawyers will argue that Roxor is trying to exploit a "loophole" in the law to illegally import vehicles that don't meet safety standards with the knowledge that (despite their disclaimers otherwise) they will be used as highway vehicles. That puts Mahindra into a very tough spot legally and it won't take long before Manhinra's own lawyers tell them to stop exporting them to the US.

To see a great example of how this actually happened, look at how quickly the 3-wheeled ATVs disappeared in the mid 1980s. It only took a few lawsuits and all of a sudden the manufacturers realized that "death trikes" were not a good thing to be selling in the US.
 

shade

Well-known member
Roxor, IMO, is trying to game the system by bringing in what is, to any observer, a 4 wheeled automobile and classifying it as a UTV so as to avoid the requirements that imported automobiles have for safety, rollover protection, air bags, emissions, lighting, etc.
yep
 

Tokarev

Member
Roxor, IMO, is trying to game the system by bringing in what is, to any observer, a 4 wheeled automobile and classifying it as a UTV so as to avoid the requirements that imported automobiles have for safety, rollover protection, air bags, emissions, lighting, etc.


Or has Mahindra identified a business opportunity and seized upon it?




Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

TripLeader

Explorer
I appreciate the quality legal views you have shared in this thread. I've learned some things.

?

That's kind of an apples-to-oranges comparison.

The Federal government has the authority to regulate IMPORTS and to require that vehicles that are imported for HIGHWAY use meet certain standards for emissions, safety, etc.

But once they're in the US, the Federal government doesn't regulate them as that is a state matter. Some states (like CA) have very strict emissions requirements that all but prohibit certain vehicles from being sold or registered there and other states have little or no emissions requirements.

States also have broad authority to regulate motorcycles and UTVs and to decide whether or under what circumstances they can be licensed for road use. In Colorado, for example, you CANNOT license a 4 wheeled vehicle for road use if it was not originally designed for road use (IOW you cannot put a license plate on a 4 wheeled ATV or UTV no matter what.) Now, there are counties in CO where ATVs/UTVs are permitted to drive on COUNTY roads, but in this case it's not so much that they're "legal" to use on the street (they're not), but rather that they are "tolerated" (or to put it differently, the county has made it a policy not to enforce the law and to look the other way.)

In other states, you CAN get a license plate on a UTV or ATV, it's almost always a "Motorcycle" license plate and sometimes there are restrictions on where you can use it (often having to do with speed limits - such as "cannot use on any road where the speed limit is greater than 50mph.")

As far as driving THOSE vehicles across state lines - yes, it CAN be legal as long as the vehicle is operated in a legal manner in BOTH states. So, for example, if South Dakota allows a Roxor to be plated as a UTV and Wyoming does as well, then you could drive a South Dakota registered ROXOR into Wyoming and vice-versa.

But you COULD NOT drive it into Colorado, even though it has a Wyoming or South Dakota plate because 4 wheeled ATVs are not street legal in CO, no matter where they are registered.

Roxor, IMO, is trying to game the system by bringing in what is, to any observer, a 4 wheeled automobile and classifying it as a UTV so as to avoid the requirements that imported automobiles have for safety, rollover protection, air bags, emissions, lighting, etc.

At this point Mahindra is basically daring the Federal government to tighten up the rules as to what can be classified as a "UTV" for purposes of importation (I don't think there are any right now.) After all, if the Mahindra is successful, what is to prevent someone from importing, say, a 70-series LC to the US and classifying it as a "UTV?" Or maybe one of those Russian 4 wheel drive vehicles that do not otherwise meet safety and emissions standards?

You could even take it to ridiculous extremes and try to import an 8x8 KAMAZ tractor as a "UTV."

But the REAL legal danger, IMO, does not come from the Feds, it comes from lawsuit-happy attorneys, the plantiff's bar. If someone gets injured because a Roxor was illegally being used on a highway - particularly if it can be claimed that the injury is due to lack of airbags, ABS, rollover protection or other things that a road-legal vehicle would have - then the lawyers will argue that Roxor is trying to exploit a "loophole" in the law to illegally import vehicles that don't meet safety standards with the knowledge that (despite their disclaimers otherwise) they will be used as highway vehicles. That puts Mahindra into a very tough spot legally and it won't take long before Manhinra's own lawyers tell them to stop exporting them to the US.

To see a great example of how this actually happened, look at how quickly the 3-wheeled ATVs disappeared in the mid 1980s. It only took a few lawsuits and all of a sudden the manufacturers realized that "death trikes" were not a good thing to be selling in the US.
 

shade

Well-known member
Or has Mahindra identified a business opportunity and seized upon it?
They're playing the grey, no doubt about it.

Maybe that'll work in the short term, but many attempts to skirt road-legal use issues end badly for owners in some way. I'd buy one with the understanding that it could always be used off-road, but that any road-legal use classification would be a bonus that could disappear.
 
Last edited:

Tokarev

Member
They're playing the grey, no doubt about it.

Maybe that'll work in the short term, but many attempts to skirt legal road legal issues end badly for owners in some way. I'd buy one with the understanding that it could always be used off-road, but that any legal road use classification would be a bonus that could disappear.
How is it any different than something like the Polaris Slingshot? That is neither car nor motorcycle and doesn't really fit the definition of either.

People keep referencing some type of "illegal" activity with these. If I abide by state licensing requirements and have the vehicle properly insured I don't see where the illegal comes in. No difference between the Roxor and many other vehicles in this regard. Again, state law vary but if I plate and insure it for street use in AZ, UT etc what's the illegal part?

Also these are no more or less safe than a 1970s or 80s CJ. Maybe even possibly more safe than some older rigs because the Rox has vacuum assisted front brakes.

Finally, if someone wrecks one of these and sues MANA how does that impact me in any way shape or form? Will a successful lawsuit somehow mean I have to turn the vehicle in for destruction?

For a place called "Expedition Portal" that involves discussing offroad and overland vehicles you'd think people would be more excited.

Merry Christmas to everyone!

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

shade

Well-known member
How is it any different than something like the Polaris Slingshot? That is neither car nor motorcycle and doesn't really fit the definition of either.

People keep referencing some type of "illegal" activity with these. If I abide by state licensing requirements and have the vehicle properly insured I don't see where the illegal comes in. No difference between the Roxor and many other vehicles in this regard. Again, state law vary but if I plate and insure it for street use in AZ, UT etc what's the illegal part?

Also these are no more or less safe than a 1970s or 80s CJ. Maybe even possibly more safe than some older rigs because the Rox has vacuum assisted front brakes.

Finally, if someone wrecks one of these and sues MANA how does that impact me in any way shape or form? Will a successful lawsuit somehow mean I have to turn the vehicle in for destruction?

For a place called "Expedition Portal" that involves discussing offroad and overland vehicles you'd think people would be more excited.

Merry Christmas to everyone!

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
I've already covered this, as have others. No need to rehash what you didn't agree with before. I don't think you understand that what may be legal today can become illegal in the future, or uninsurable, which would have the same end result.

Excitement has nothing to do with it. I don't want one, but I'm happy to see more options for those that are. I don't think it's wise to pretend there's no risk that using a Roxor on the road can't come to an end, though.
 

Tokarev

Member
I've already covered this, as have others. No need to rehash what you didn't agree with before. I don't think you understand that what may be legal today can become illegal in the future, or uninsurable, which would have the same end result.

Excitement has nothing to do with it. I don't want one, but I'm happy to see more options for those that are. I don't think it's wise to pretend there's no risk that using a Roxor on the road can't come to an end, though.

Assumptions on all parties is what we have here. Nothing more.

We'll cross that bridge if and when it needs crossing.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

shade

Well-known member
Assumptions on all parties is what we have here. Nothing more.

We'll cross that bridge if and when it needs crossing.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Not really. As I see it, on-road use of the Roxor boils down to some basic parameters, with no assumptions involved.

1. If they can be used legally on the road today, there's no assumption involved in saying they can be used legally on the road today.

2. If the law is changed to prevent their use on the road, or insurors decide to make it impractical or impossible to insure one, there's no assumption involved in saying it won't be possible to use one legally on the road if those changes occur.

3. Mahindra is definitely marketing the Roxor as a SxS; it's all over their website as such. No assumption there.

4. Using vehicles designated for off-road use - as Mahindra has with the Roxor - on the road can present legal issues; not an assumption.

Pretty simple. The only assumption I see is if someone assumes that #4 isn't true.
 

AbleGuy

Officious Intermeddler
For those of you who can’t afford the Roxor, or a jeep, here’s a cheaper version for you (and you can easily buy these mail order too!):

F978DE42-18A0-4C9E-AEB2-49D9E48EABCE.png
 

Tokarev

Member
Check about 8:15 into video for some good views of the Mahindra North America assembly plant.


Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
185,533
Messages
2,875,605
Members
224,922
Latest member
Randy Towles
Top