That's no kidding.Wouldn't this forum be to blame first?
Typically artifacts are considered historical at 100 years and property can be at 50 years.Sooooo, how much time has to pass for graffiti is considered a petroglyph?
I agree, I find it hard to even say the word 'overland' anymore out of disgust for what it now represents. In my eyes social media is the biggest problem of it all as the outreach it provides from a single platform is unreal. I know I am getting old now because posts of basically stock vehicles with a set of lights, a hitch shackle and some mud terrains get thousands of likes while parked in front of a coffee shop with 19,000 hashtags and mentions makes me irritated.
Don't get me wrong, we should all take pride in our vehicles and the fruits of our labors, but it used to be that vehicles that were highlighted were highly modified and actually being used off-road or on some excursion or adventure. Now anyone with a near stock vehicle can become instafamous because they take good pictures and pose their vehicles next to their other instafamous buddies on the homeless foot trail in the woods behind their local grocery store. They've been going off-road on weekend day trips for a year and suddenly they are ambassadors for the hobby and subject matter experts on how to recover a vehicle from a mud hole with the use of $7K in niche recovery gear lol. Now we have the masses of uneducated d-bags desperate for likes on the gram willing to shill for free products and a following and that's how we end up with instances like this one.
That's no kidding.
Typically artifacts are considered historical at 100 years and property can be at 50 years.
You know the irony, though, about the 50 year rule was that when it was first really considered in the 1940s and 1950s that was long enough to not fully protect the native and early American settlement history in the early years of the atomic age. They destroyed a lot of stuff and places in the Southwest with nuclear testing and uranium mines. However now all those old sites would qualify for historical protection being 50+ years old.
Backcountry skiers and climbers have been touchy about giving up the goods in guidebooks for as long as I've been backcountry skiing and climbing. I know fishermen are like that, too.Heck, I used to blame Outside magazine for giving up all of the secret spots. Before that it was Field & Stream.
No one is really sure. Wondering if some adolescent got scolded by the elders for graffiti?Do these mean anything, or were Native Americans bored, doodling to leave their mark?
Backcountry skiers and climbers have been touchy about giving up the goods in guidebooks for as long as I've been backcountry skiing and climbing. I know fishermen are like that, too.
No one is really sure. Wondering if some adolescent got scolded by the elders for graffiti?
Could be guides to hunting, a community notice, religious or farmer's almanac. Could be just a bored sheepherder or street (trail?) artist leaving a "I Was Here" and what he saw around him. There are panels where later peoples modified or drew over earlier ones' glyphs. They were probably of some significance but we can only make assumptions.
I totally would believe humans weren't any different then and ultimately random scribbling and graffiti now will be a statement to a future archeologist, too. We're leaving a lot more explanation but in 500 years who's to say anything written will be around to decipher it? All that will be left is that which lasts on a geological timeline. So our era will be defined by crude rock art, graveyards and plastic crap preserved in landfills. We're going to look positively primitive.
I am not defending the guy, but he owned the incident and is taking steps to correct the damage. Why the flame war?
I don't care for his style, his truck, or most of his followers, but how else could he have made this right?
Internet mob mentality. As we wait for the next outrage...isn't everybody roasting Aunt Becky from Full House now?
If you're gonna deface some rock, at least have some creativity....Hell, Pinterest has loads and loads of idears...
You're right. It seems like there is a lot of suppressed anger or resentment toward these people that are able to make a living off of the internet. Is it actually overlanding? No, ask Ted Simon. That guy was an overlander. I am sure there were folks in Ted's day that thought he was hurting the culture by taking photos and documenting his travels. Today he is a legend. Overlanding as a trend, culture, or whatever you want to call it is changing. You can get on board and participate or don't, but why bash people making a living off of something fun?
… So who do we blame? …
i'll take responsibility
I am not suggesting we go easy on the guy. I hate the culture and "that guy" that is attracted to his feed. It is making it harder for people that respect land and property to travel, but his feed is nothing compared to the irreparable damage being done by the millions of side by sides on the trail right now. They are out of control.For anyone going easy on this guy, it's not just the rock vandalism. There's pretty blatant stuff like this too. Tread Lightly? Nope.
I am not suggesting we go easy on the guy. I hate the culture and "that guy" that is attracted to his feed. It is making it harder for people that respect land and property to travel, but his feed is nothing compared to the irreparable damage being done by the millions of side by sides on the trail right now. They are out of control.