blackangie
Well-known member
Bond

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Bonnet curves around the checker plate, can see on invictus shots and tuskLooks nice!
So the hood opening will be quite narrow compared to the size of the overall "hood" area? Pics show me that's how classic Defenders work. Does that give a much smaller area to work in? I'm used to the full opening of the LR3.
Its a bond villian, why its all blacked outAll black is probably not the best look- a classic color, blue or green Defender with a white or black roof- some accessories will look much better. Still eager to see it officially roll out and what all LR does with it, happy to see another solid 4x4 in the market place; it doesn't quite grab me like I thought it would; at least this photo doesn't.
I would bet its realIs this photoshopped? it looks really good if it's for real.
So whats the difference to unbolting an engine and lifting unibody up to unbolting a cab, lifting the cab up, then removing engine or working on? very little imo.95% of vehicles built from almost every manufacturer are designed for "cab-off" maintenance! WE can't do it of course, but LR dealership can probably pull the body up on the lift to expose the engine from the bottom in about two-hours; they then charge YOU, the customer, 10 hours of labor and $3k to do it! hahaha. LR did not design it this way for you to work on; they designed it this way for them to work on it for you! $$$$$
My cousin is a long time Ford Mech and they can take an F350 off the frame in about 45 minutes; they do almost all of the engine/trans maintenance this way!
Nobody is designing vehicles for difficult maintenance/repair. It's a packaging/production issue. This is such a common misconception which has been passed down for decades now about how all new cars (of that time) are just 'scamming' you for extra dealer revenue.LR did not design it this way for you to work on; they designed it this way for them to work on it for you! $$$$$
My cousin is a long time Ford Mech and they can take an F350 off the frame in about 45 minutes; they do almost all of the engine/trans maintenance this way!
Not sure you’re going to get that manual transmission, I don’t remember from the blurry photo on the spec sheet someone posted. Other than the driving experience however, the Land Rover ZF autos are REALLY good. Besides the Allison in my Chevy 2500HD, they are the only ones that seem to keep you from yelling at them “No! Why are you doing that? Quit gear hunting!” They seem to do exactly what you would, can utilize engine braking, and you can choose a gear manually in the event that it won’t do what you want.The new Defender could be the unicorn I’ve been looking for, if it indeed checks all these boxes:
1. Truly capable off-road (no rock crawling)
2. Luxurious interior
3. Manual transmission
4. Sub $60k MSRP
5. Nice ride on pavement
I do like my JLU but it’s loud, kind of cramped, and sort of “bleh” interior. I understand it’s a wrangler but FCA is getting closer to my unicorn than any other current vehicle available.
Agreed. It’s just a matter of “X” being installed before “Y” and only the companies that race actually care about ease of maintenance.Nobody is designing vehicles for difficult maintenance/repair. It's a packaging/production issue. This is such a common misconception which has been passed down for decades now about how all new cars (of that time) are just 'scamming' you for extra dealer revenue.
You're right about many vehicles being serviced body-off to save time for flat rate costs, but this practice does not drive design.